Challenge every field
before collecting it.
Review abstract public-form field labels before launch. Record why each field exists, whether it is required, its sensitivity class, when retention is reconsidered, a safer alternative and a human decision. Unknown stays unknown.
Field-by-field necessity and sensitivity register
| Field | Purpose / necessity | Sensitivity | Retention trigger | Safer alternative | Decision / reviewer | Evidence | Classification |
|---|
Questions and unresolved scope
“Documented” means only that the entered decision fields are present and internally coherent. It does not prove necessity, lawfulness, proportionality, security, accessibility, consent, retention compliance or a safe implementation.
Privacy and collection boundary: this browser-only review never fetches a page, discovers hidden fields, reads a submission, stores field values, scans code or identifies applicable law. Use only public labels or synthetic aliases; never paste URLs, names, emails, phone numbers, credentials, tokens, payment details, health information, application answers or customer data. Sensitivity classes are routing prompts, not legal categories. The actual product, purpose, jurisdiction, disclosures, security, retention, deletion and professional advice remain human-owned.
$7 once field register + version-diff evidence pack
Turn one complete abstract review into an editable multi-form decision register with version comparisons, owner sign-off and implementation/retest receipts. Payment buys structure—not form hosting, scanning, legal review or compliance.
- seed field-purpose decision ledger
- blank multi-form inventory
- before/after version-diff matrix
- retention-trigger and safer-alternative queue
- implementation and test evidence placeholders
- product/privacy reviewer sign-off
Current minimization guidance and visible platform substitutes
先核对当前来源与工具边界Check current sources and tool limits first