A promise is not behavior.
An interpretation is not evidence.
Paste one already-redacted interview note with one idea per line. Every line stays visible beside a transparent cue-based suggestion and a human classification. The tool counts evidence types and exposes weak support; it does not summarize the interview or decide what to build.
Interview evidence separator
| Line | Redacted source text | Cue suggestion | Human classification | Correction |
|---|
Counts are an evidence hygiene aid, not a sentiment score, frequency estimate, customer truth, demand forecast, theme synthesis or roadmap recommendation. One line can be memorable and still not generalize.
Research and privacy boundary: the note stays in this browser until the user explicitly generates a paid redacted report. No recording, transcription, recruitment, identity, CRM, repository or raw-event system is connected. Cue suggestions are literal phrase matches—not AI understanding—and may be wrong; the human researcher must inspect original context, consent, sample bias, interviewer effects and counterevidence. Do not enter names, contact data, account/user IDs, sensitive personal data or secrets.
$9/mo Interview evidence review membership
Unlock repeat editable Markdown evidence packs for up to 200 redacted lines, including source traceability, human corrections, classification counts, counterevidence prompts and decision signoff. No repository, recording or automated conclusion is included.
- source-line to evidence-type traceability
- transparent cue suggestion and correction receipts
- fact, behavior, observation, opinion and commitment separation
- hypothesis, counterevidence and decision record
- research owner and privacy review signoff
Mature evidence-traceability substitutes and the lightweight wedge
PMF pre-judgment 74/100 · recurring evidence-bias risk, narrow wedge against mature research platforms