10000app #0062 · PMF pre-judgment 77/100 · real repository-decay problem, narrow buyer and strong platform substitutes

Evidence has a date.
Truth needs a review.

Review one redacted product insight against its original sample, segment, product version, current changes and linked decisions. Time and change triggers only set review priority; a named human records whether the evidence still applies.

Audit one insight locally 核对依据

Free · browser-only

Evidence applicability review

Evidence alias Research date Human-written insight summary Method Sample size Original user segment Current target segment Product version then Product version now Market / locale then Market / locale now Source reference Evidence owner role Decision using this evidence The linked decision is still active or pending

Human-observed change triggersThese raise review priority. They do not prove the insight is wrong.

Product / journey changed Pricing / packaging changed Target segment changed Market / locale changed New contradictory / narrowing evidence Decision context changed Human review status Next review date Human status reason and evidence

Review priorityADD EVIDENCE CONTEXT

Elapsed age—

Observed change triggers0

Linked decision activeNO / UNKNOWN

Next reviewNOT SET

Human statusUNREVIEWED

Scope	At research	At current decision	Exact match

The tool never applies a universal expiry window. A recent study can be weak; old evidence can remain applicable. Review priority is not a confidence score or research conclusion.

Research boundary: inputs stay in this browser; the paid workpack receives only this redacted review record. Do not enter participant names, quotes, recordings, transcripts, personal data, confidential roadmap details or raw research. The tool cannot verify a source, judge method quality, infer representativeness, decide roadmap or pricing, or declare evidence true or false. A responsible product/research owner must review the original evidence and current decision context.

Paid · one-time

$9 Evidence applicability workpack

Unlock an editable Markdown review record with original context, current scope comparison, observed triggers, human status reason, decision-impact questions and signoff. It is one-time; membership waits until repeat audits and persistence are proven.

original method, sample, segment, product and market context
current-scope comparison without automatic expiry
human-observed change and contradictory-evidence triggers
linked-decision impact and re-research questions
status reason, owner, next review and signoff record

unlocked · product-evidence-age only

生成当前方案

Source ledger

Repository substitutes and the narrow applicability-review wedge

PMF pre-judgment 77/100 · real repository-decay problem, narrow buyer and strong platform substitutes

Dovetail · Maintaining an insight libraryDirect evidence that repositories need ownership, periodic audits and explicit retirement of outdated insights.Dovetail · Workspace fieldsStrong substitute for structured, searchable research metadata inside a full repository.Condens · Artifact information fieldsStrong substitute using structured artifact fields, permissions, sorting and filtering.Productboard · Linked customer insightsStrong substitute that connects evidence directly to current feature decisions.

Evidence has a date.Truth needs a review.

Evidence applicability review

$9 Evidence applicability workpack

Repository substitutes and the narrow applicability-review wedge

Evidence has a date.
Truth needs a review.